*
facebook
Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Delays in Processing 2010 Income Tax Returns
Incorrect Super on Payment Summaries
Use a Registered Tax Agent to Improve Cash Flow
Tax Debts Deferral
Cooper Review
Tax and the Non-resident Investors
Deemed Dividends
Making Investment Decisions – Have you done your Research?
GOVERNMENT CONTINUES REDUCED SUPER PENSION DRAW RULES
Pension Payment Minimums for 2010/11
3 Tax Time Checklists - Company, Individual and Superannuation Fund
Overseas Investment in Australia – Confusion reigns.
Bank Fees Dropping
Personal Credit Ratings – Part 2
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 3 July - September 2004
Quarter 2 April - June 2004
Quarter 1 January - March 2004
Quarter 4 October - December 2003
Quarter 3 July - September 2003
Quarter 2 April - June 2003
Quarter 1 January - March 2003
Quarter 4 October - December 2002
Careful of what you Promise
Advertising can be a wonderful thing.  Marketers go to great lengths to differentiate products and for the consumer to remember a product.

It’s just as well that accountants, lawyers (couple of public company exceptions) or financial services firms don’t make any outlandish claims as they can end up in hot water.

Unilever is about to find out about the penalty for the outlandish claims of its Lynx deodorant.

Lynx is supposed to make every good-looking girl attracted to the man who is wearing the body spray.

However, a man is now suing Unilever because he claims he’s been using Lynx and still hasn’t had a girlfriend for seven years.

Vaibhav Bev is taking the makers of Lynx to court in India, over $100,000 for depression and psychological damage.

What’s the chance we never hear about this case again, because there is an out of court settlement?

 

 

 

 

 

 



17th-February-2010